Corporate Accountability & the Johannesburg Earth Summit
   

· Earth Summit 101

· Corporate Failure Since Rio

· Six Reasons for Accountability

· Accountability vs Responsibility

· Rules for Big Business

· FoEI's Position Paper

· Type 2 Outcomes - Voluntary Partnerships

· The Bush Administration and the Earth Summit

Corporate Impacts Issue Briefs: Water, Biodiversity

Polluted Profits
· Bush's First Year in Office
· Environmental Rollbacks
· Accounting Tricks
· Corporate Veil of Secrecy
· Paying Polluters

Case Studies of
Corporate Irresponsibility

· AES
· Doe Run
· Enron
· ExxonMobil
· Monsanto
· Newmont
· Nike
· Unocal
· Suez-Lyonnaise
· Vivendi


Unocal in Burma

“From the beginning, Unocal denied that there were any human rights abuses associated with the Yadana project. A 1994 report to Unocal shareholders touted "absolute respect for human rights" on the project. What Unocal did not disclose, however, was that the project used the Burmese military to provide security and other services, a military that was notorious for torture, murder, rape, and the pervasive use of forced labor.

The revelation that Unocal is using the Burmese military to provide security for its project means that Unocal is complicit in every human rights abuse committed by these soldiers.

If Unocal had been required to disclose this relationship from the beginning, it might have considered other options rather than admit that it was hiring one of the most abusive militaries in the world.”

The Unocal Corporation is an oil and gas company based in California, with operations in 14 countries around the world. Unocal has come under fire for human rights abuses associated with a gas pipeline project in Burma, the details of which have taken years to come to light.

Unocal claims to be committed to the respect for human rights and the environment in all of their activities and the promotion of responsibility for these ideals everywhere. The company puts the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on their website, speaks of multi-party stakeholder processes, and attempts to join the international humanitarian community. But Unocal does not advertise that it uses the Burmese military, with one of the worst human rights records in the world, as a security force for its investment in Burma.

In 1993, Unocal joined the French oil giant Total (now TotalFinaElf) in developing the Yadana gas pipeline, which would transport gas from offshore Burmese reserves, across Burma, and into Thailand. Another member of the Yadana consortium is the state oil company of military-ruled Burma, such that Unocal is in a direct partnership with the Burmese government.

From the beginning, Unocal denied that there were any human rights abuses associated with the Yadana project. A 1994 report to Unocal shareholders touted "absolute respect for human rights" on the project. What Unocal did not disclose, however, was that the project used the Burmese military to provide security and other services, a military that was notorious for torture, murder, rape, and the pervasive use of forced labor.

Unocal's relationship with the military became public only after it was sued by victims of the pipeline project. Lawyers for the plaintiffs obtained U.S. State Department cables under the Freedom of Information Act, which told of how Unocal officials stated that they had "hired the Burmese military to provide security for the project," and that they pay the army through the state oil company. Internal Unocal documents, including correspondence with Total, revealed that Burmese troops had been "assigned to provide security" on the pipeline project, and that "four battalions of 600 men each" were used to protect the pipeline corridor.

Human rights groups have gathered copious evidence that these Burmese military battalions have committed countless human rights abuses. The soldiers relocated villages, tortured innocent villagers, murdered people without reason, and raped women. The most pervasive abuse is forced labor, in which ordinary villagers are regularly conscripted to work for the military, work that includes carrying heavy loads of food and ammunition for the soldiers on their patrols. The evidence of these abuses has been confirmed by a federal judge, who found that the plaintiffs suing Unocal had evidence that "Unocal knew that the military had a record of committing human rights abuses; that the [Yadana] Project hired the military to provide security for the Project, a military that forced villagers to work and entire villages to relocate for the benefit of the Project; that the military, while forcing villagers to work and relocate, committed numerous acts of violence; and that Unocal knew or should have known that the military did commit, was committing and would continue to commit" human rights abuses.

The revelation that Unocal is using the Burmese military to provide security for its project means that Unocal is complicit in every human rights abuse committed by these soldiers. If Unocal had been required to disclose this relationship from the beginning, it might have considered other options rather than admit that it was hiring one of the most abusive militaries in the world.

Written by Marco Simmons
August 2002
EarthRights International

top

 
home | take action | media center | related links